IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v16y2012i4p462-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Risk Classification with an Application to Substandard Annuities

Author

Listed:
  • Nadine Gatzert
  • Gudrun Schmitt-Hoermann
  • Hato Schmeiser

Abstract

Substandard annuities pay higher pensions to individuals with impaired health and thus require special underwriting of applicants. Although such risk classification can substantially increase a company's profitability, these products are uncommon except for the well-established U.K. market. In this paper we comprehensively analyze this issue and make several contributions to the literature. First, we describe enhanced, impaired life, and care annuities, and then we discuss the underwriting process and underwriting risk related thereto. Second, we propose a theoretical model to determine the optimal profit-maximizing risk classification system for substandard annuities. Based on the model framework and for given price-demand dependencies, we formally show the effect of classification costs and costs of underwriting risk on profitability for insurers. Risk classes are distinguished by the average mortality of contained insureds, whereby mortality heterogeneity is included by means of a frailty model. Third, we discuss key aspects regarding a practical implementation of our model as well as possible market entry barriers for substandard annuity providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadine Gatzert & Gudrun Schmitt-Hoermann & Hato Schmeiser, 2012. "Optimal Risk Classification with an Application to Substandard Annuities," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 462-486.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:16:y:2012:i:4:p:462-486
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2012.10597643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2012.10597643
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2012.10597643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, An & Fuino, Michel & Sehner, Thorsten & Wagner, Joël, 2022. "Valuation of long-term care options embedded in life annuities," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 68-94, March.
    2. Martin Eling & Irina Gemmo & Danjela Guxha & Hato Schmeiser, 2024. "Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 49(1), pages 75-126, March.
    3. Ermanno Pitacco & Daniela Y. Tabakova, 2022. "Special-Rate Life Annuities: Analysis of Portfolio Risk Profiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Mao Hong & Carson James M. & Ostaszewski Krzysztof M., 2018. "Optimal Price Setting and Insurer Capital Management in a Multiple Line Context," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:16:y:2012:i:4:p:462-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.