IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tsysxx/v48y2017i11p2440-2450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensor selection cost optimisation for tracking structurally cyclic systems: a P-order solution

Author

Listed:
  • M. Doostmohammadian
  • H. Zarrabi
  • H. R. Rabiee

Abstract

Measurements and sensing implementations impose certain cost in sensor networks. The sensor selection cost optimisation is the problem of minimising the sensing cost of monitoring a physical (or cyber-physical) system. Consider a given set of sensors tracking states of a dynamical system for estimation purposes. For each sensor assume different costs to measure different (realisable) states. The idea is to assign sensors to measure states such that the global cost is minimised. The number and selection of sensor measurements need to ensure the observability to track the dynamic state of the system with bounded estimation error. The main question we address is how to select the state measurements to minimise the cost while satisfying the observability conditions. Relaxing the observability condition for structurally cyclic systems, the main contribution is to propose a graph theoretic approach to solve the problem in polynomial time. Note that polynomial time algorithms are suitable for large-scale systems as their running time is upper-bounded by a polynomial expression in the size of input for the algorithm. We frame the problem as a linear sum assignment with solution complexity of O(m3)$\mathcal {O}(m^3)$.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Doostmohammadian & H. Zarrabi & H. R. Rabiee, 2017. "Sensor selection cost optimisation for tracking structurally cyclic systems: a P-order solution," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 2440-2450, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:48:y:2017:i:11:p:2440-2450
    DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2017.1322640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207721.2017.1322640
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207721.2017.1322640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang-Yu Liu & Jean-Jacques Slotine & Albert-László Barabási, 2011. "Controllability of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7346), pages 167-173, May.
    2. Pentico, David W., 2007. "Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 774-793, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.
    2. Andreas Koulouris & Ioannis Katerelos & Theodore Tsekeris, 2013. "Multi-Equilibria Regulation Agent-Based Model of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 11(1), pages 51-70.
    3. He, He & Yang, Bo & Hu, Xiaoming, 2016. "Exploring community structure in networks by consensus dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 342-353.
    4. Pritibhushan Sinha, 2009. "Assignment problems with changeover cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 447-457, November.
    5. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    6. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    7. Meng, Tao & Duan, Gaopeng & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2023. "Control energy scaling for target control of complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Qingzhu Yao & Xiaoyan Zhu & Way Kuo, 2014. "A Birnbaum-importance based genetic local search algorithm for component assignment problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 185-200, January.
    9. Tao Jia & Robert F Spivey & Boleslaw Szymanski & Gyorgy Korniss, 2015. "An Analysis of the Matching Hypothesis in Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Yang, Xu-Hua & Lou, Shun-Li & Chen, Guang & Chen, Sheng-Yong & Huang, Wei, 2013. "Scale-free networks via attaching to random neighbors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(17), pages 3531-3536.
    11. Zhang, Rui & Wang, Xiaomeng & Cheng, Ming & Jia, Tao, 2019. "The evolution of network controllability in growing networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 257-266.
    12. Wouter Vermeer & Otto Koppius & Peter Vervest, 2018. "The Radiation-Transmission-Reception (RTR) model of propagation: Implications for the effectiveness of network interventions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Chen, Shi-Ming & Xu, Yun-Fei & Nie, Sen, 2017. "Robustness of network controllability in cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 536-539.
    14. Xizhe Zhang & Huaizhen Wang & Tianyang Lv, 2017. "Efficient target control of complex networks based on preferential matching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, April.
    15. Pang, Shao-Peng & Hao, Fei, 2018. "Effect of interaction strength on robustness of controlling edge dynamics in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 246-257.
    16. Xiao, Guanping & Zheng, Zheng & Wang, Haoqin, 2017. "Evolution of Linux operating system network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 249-258.
    17. Gennady Ougolnitsky & Olga Gorbaneva, 2022. "Sustainable Management in Active Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Ágoston, Kolos Csaba & Biró, Péter & Szántó, Richárd, 2018. "Stable project allocation under distributional constraints," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 59-68.
    19. Qing Han, 2013. "Managing Emergencies Optimally Using a Random Neural Network-Based Algorithm," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Morrill, Thayer & Roth, Alvin E., 2024. "Top trading cycles," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:48:y:2017:i:11:p:2440-2450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSYS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.