IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tsysxx/v46y2015i6p1010-1019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decisions on new product development under uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Yeu-Shiang Huang
  • Li-Chen Liu
  • Jyh-Wen Ho

Abstract

In an intensively competitive market, developing a new product has become a valuable strategy for companies to establish their market positions and enhance their competitive advantages. Therefore, it is essential to effectively manage the process of new product development (NPD). However, since various problems may arise in NPD projects, managers should set up some milestones and subsequently construct evaluative mechanisms to assess their feasibility. This paper employed the approach of Bayesian decision analysis to deal with the two crucial uncertainties for NPD, which are the future market share and the responses of competitors. The proposed decision process can provide a systematic analytical procedure to determine whether an NPD project should be continued or not under the consideration of whether effective usage is being made of the organisational resources. Accordingly, the proposed decision model can assist the managers in effectively addressing the NPD issue under the competitive market.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeu-Shiang Huang & Li-Chen Liu & Jyh-Wen Ho, 2015. "Decisions on new product development under uncertainties," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 1010-1019, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:46:y:2015:i:6:p:1010-1019
    DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2013.807382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207721.2013.807382
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207721.2013.807382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald G. Hudson & John C. Chambers & Robert G. Johnston, 1977. "New Product Planning Decisions Under Uncertainty," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 8(1-part-2), pages 82-96, November.
    2. Hsin-Hung Wu & Ya-Ning Tsai, 2012. "An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 2114-2124.
    3. Paul S. Adler & Avi Mandelbaum & Viên Nguyen & Elizabeth Schwerer, 1995. "From Project to Process Management: An Empirically-Based Framework for Analyzing Product Development Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 458-484, March.
    4. Driva, H. & Pawar, K. S. & Menon, U., 2000. "Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 147-159, January.
    5. Robert K. Perdue & William J. McAllister & Peter V. King & Bruce G. Berkey, 1999. "Valuation of R and D Projects Using Options Pricing and Decision Analysis Models," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 57-74, December.
    6. Morris A. Cohen & Jehoshua Eliasberg & Teck-Hua Ho, 1996. "New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 173-186, February.
    7. N.C. Suganya & G.A. Pai, 2012. "Wavelet evolutionary network for complex-constrained portfolio rebalancing," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 1367-1385.
    8. Pawar, Kulwant S. & Driva, Helen, 1999. "Performance measurement for product design and development in a manufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 61-68, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosanna Spano & Fabrizia Sarto & Adele Caldarelli & Riccardo Vigano, 2016. "Innovation & Performance Measurement: An Adapted Balanced Scorecard," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 194-194, May.
    2. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Scott A. Shane & Karl T. Ulrich, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 133-144, February.
    4. Pascale Crama & Fabian J. Sting & Yaozhong Wu, 2019. "Encouraging Help Across Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1408-1429, March.
    5. Yen Hsu, 2013. "Design Co-creation and Performance in New Product Development Process," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 4(3), pages 63-74, September.
    6. Mohan V. Tatikonda & Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss, 2001. "Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 151-172, January.
    7. Yen Hsu, 2017. "Organizational Innovation, Design And Npd Performance: The Role Of Co-Creation Strategy," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Kathy A. Paulson Gjerde & Susan A. Slotnick & Matthew J. Sobel, 2002. "New Product Innovation with Multiple Features and Technology Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1268-1284, October.
    9. Salimi, Negin & Rezaei, Jafar, 2018. "Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 147-155.
    10. Bo Zhang & Jin Peng & Shengguo Li, 2015. "Uncertain programming models for portfolio selection with uncertain returns," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 2510-2519, October.
    11. Smith, Robert P. & Eppinger, Steven D., 1991. "Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration," Working papers 3348-91., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    13. Armstrong, Michael J & Levesque, Moren, 2002. "Timing and quality decisions for entrepreneurial product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 88-106, August.
    14. Hyoung Jun Kim & Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Cost–benefit model for multi-generational high-technology products to compare sequential innovation strategy with quality strategy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Guha, Mahua & Das, Gopal, 2017. "Routine contraction in good times: An example of a typical prototype development routine," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 145-152.
    16. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    17. Karan Girotra & Christian Terwiesch & Karl T. Ulrich, 2007. "Valuing R& D Projects in a Portfolio: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1452-1466, September.
    18. Urszula Mikiewicz & Miroslaw Moroz, 2021. "Trade-Offs Occurring in the Process of Commercialization of SARS-CoV-2 Test in a Narrow Window of Opportunity," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 294-313.
    19. Lim, Wei Shi & Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Optimal product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 905-922, October.
    20. Erica Plambeck & Qiong Wang, 2009. "Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 333-347, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:46:y:2015:i:6:p:1010-1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSYS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.