IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v41y2021i3p329-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical evidence on the impacts of bikesharing: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • João Filipe Teixeira
  • Cecília Silva
  • Frederico Moura e Sá

Abstract

In recent years, bikesharing has become one of the most popular policies promoting cycling across the world. As the number of bikesharing systems (BSS) continues to rise, it is increasingly important to quantify their expected benefits. This paper synthetises the available evidence on the current impacts of implementing a BSS, with a special focus on the induced modal shift dynamics and impacts in car reduction, indicating how increasing the attractiveness of BSS to car users could improve its benefits. Several benefits have been associated to bikesharing, but they are not equally distributed and are dependent on several nuances, particularly on modal shifts. Among the biggest contributions are the increases in physical activity (PA) levels (triggering health gains) as well as travel time savings to the BSS users. Bikesharing is mostly replacing sustainable modes of transport, with modest car replacing rates. However, bikesharing can also indirectly decrease car travel by fostering synergies with Public Transport (by expanding catchment areas, reducing overcrowding and overall travel times) and by promoting cycling use through increasing the number and diversity of cyclists. Furthermore, different types of modal shift lead to different benefits. Reductions in car travel induce decreases in greenhouse gases (GHG) and other air pollutants, increases in PA, time savings as well as congestion reductions. Conversely, new trips generated by BSS also lead to increases in PA, while modal shift from walking to BSS has been associated with travel time savings. Shifting PT users to BSS can also reduce overcrowding in saturated PT networks. The most social disadvantaged groups were found to be systematically under-represented among BSS users, yet equity measures combined with awareness-raising campaigns could increase usage rates. Exploring potential advantages of BSS against car use and increasing its car replacing rates, coupled with better impact assessments, should constitute research priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • João Filipe Teixeira & Cecília Silva & Frederico Moura e Sá, 2021. "Empirical evidence on the impacts of bikesharing: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 329-351, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:329-351
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1841328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2020.1841328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2020.1841328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mora, Rodrigo & Miranda-Marquez, Sebastián & Truffello, Ricardo & Sadarangani, Kabir P., 2024. "Bikesharing and ordinary cyclists from Chile: Comparing trips, attitudes, and health-behaviours," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Minnich, Aljoscha, 2023. "Gamification in the transport sector: Quasi-experimental evidence from a bicycle navigation app," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Moura e Sá, Frederico, 2023. "Factors influencing modal shift to bike sharing: Evidence from a travel survey conducted during COVID-19," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Zhao, Chunkai & Wang, Yuhang & Ge, Zhenyu, 2023. "Is digital finance environmentally friendly in China? Evidence from shared-bike trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 129-143.
    5. Ghasri, Milad & Ardeshiri, Ali & Zhang, Xiang & Waller, S. Travis, 2024. "Analysing preferences for integrated micromobility and public transport systems: A hierarchical latent class approach considering taste heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Sangwan Lee, 2022. "An In-Depth Understanding of the Residential Property Value Premium of a Bikesharing Service in Portland, Oregon," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Vu Ngoc Tru & An Minh Ngoc, 2024. "Exploring Tourists’ Preferences for Bike-Sharing Services in the Context of Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Yiling Deng & Pengjun Zhao, 2023. "The determinants of shared bike use in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Moura e Sá, Frederico, 2022. "The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users’ motivations during COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 24-37.
    10. Ji, Shujuan & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing, 2024. "The role of road infrastructures in the usage of bikeshare and private bicycle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 234-246.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:41:y:2021:i:3:p:329-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.