IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v34y2014i6p710-729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train delay and perceived-wait time: passengers' perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yung-Hsiang Cheng
  • Yu-Chun Tsai

Abstract

Waiting time influences the overall perception of service quality. The passenger-perceived waiting time can determine their waiting experience. The concept of waiting time refers to the comparison between the passengers' inherent tolerance of waiting and the possible improvement scenarios. This study investigates the passengers' tolerance of waiting under various scenarios of train delays in order to improve their perceived waiting time. We propose the adoption of a modern psychometric method utilizing the Rasch model to measure a subjective latent construct known as 'wait tolerance'. The Rasch measurement provides mathematical procedures for transforming scores from an ordinal to an interval scale to observe which scenarios can reduce certain passengers' perceived waiting time in the case of a delay. Empirical results show that 'uncontrollable circumstances', 'friendly staff attitudes', and 'providing appropriate messages of apology' can improve the passenger-perceived waiting time during train delays. Likewise, distinct differences are found in the passengers' tolerance of waiting in terms of various personal characteristics, such as gender, age, and train riding frequency. The findings propose the implementation of strategies for improvement by rail system operators, as well as for regulators to define a reasonable service level in the case of train delays. The reviews show possible future innovative research orientations as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Yung-Hsiang Cheng & Yu-Chun Tsai, 2014. "Train delay and perceived-wait time: passengers' perspective," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 710-729, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:710-729
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2014.975169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2014.975169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2014.975169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Huisman, D. & Schöbel, A. & Schmidt, M.E., 2012. "Delay Management including Capacities of Stations," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2012-22, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arora, Swapan Deep & Mathur, Sameer, 2020. "Effect of airline choice and temporality on flight delays," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Meng, Meng & Rau, Andreas & Mahardhika, Hita, 2018. "Public transport travel time perception: Effects of socioeconomic characteristics, trip characteristics and facility usage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 24-37.
    3. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schön, Cornelia & König, Eva, 2018. "A stochastic dynamic programming approach for delay management of a single train line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 501-518.
    2. Gao, Yuan & Kroon, Leo & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2018. "Three-stage optimization method for the problem of scheduling additional trains on a high-speed rail corridor," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 175-191.
    3. Dekker, M.M. & van Lieshout, R.N. & Ball, R.C. & Bouman, P.C. & Dekker, S.C. & Dijkstra, H.A. & Goverde, R.M.P. & Huisman, D. & Panja, D. & Schaafsma, A.M. & van den Akker, M., 2018. "A Next Step in Disruption Management: Combining Operations Research and Complexity Science," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Corman, Francesco & D’Ariano, Andrea & Marra, Alessio D. & Pacciarelli, Dario & Samà, Marcella, 2017. "Integrating train scheduling and delay management in real-time railway traffic control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 213-239.
    5. Bettinelli, Andrea & Santini, Alberto & Vigo, Daniele, 2017. "A real-time conflict solution algorithm for the train rescheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 237-265.
    6. Cacchiani, V. & Huisman, D. & Kidd, M.P. & Kroon, L.G. & Toth, P. & Veelenturf, L.P. & Wagenaar, J.C., 2013. "An Overview of Recovery Models for Real-time Railway Rescheduling," Econometric Institute Research Papers 50112, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    7. Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Mauro Piacentini, 2016. "Optimal Train Dispatching by Benders’-Like Reformulation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 910-925, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:710-729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.