IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i19p5844-5866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes of supply chain dependence asymmetry: a systematic review of the statistical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Young Kim
  • Bruce Fortado

Abstract

This literature review scrutinises 41 quantitative studies dealing with dependence asymmetry in supply chains. Strategically, behaviours ranging from exploitation to win-win problem solving can arise. Five research questions are explored. The systematic literature review method and a content analysis was applied to articles from premier journals in operations management and supply chain management. We found the number of studies markedly rose over the past 15 years. Five outcome categories (i.e. performance, relationship characteristics, practice and process, information sharing, and innovation) and three subcategories (i.e. supplier, customer and partner dependence) were identified that encompass each of the sample studies. The most commonly used theories proved to be resource dependence theory and transaction cost theory. We examined whether dependence asymmetry resulted in overall benefits or detriments. There were largely positive significant results in performance, practice and process, and information sharing. The results in relationship characteristics and innovation were mixed. The overall picture was more complex than the stronger firm simply taking advantage of the weaker firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Young Kim & Bruce Fortado, 2021. "Outcomes of supply chain dependence asymmetry: a systematic review of the statistical evidence," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(19), pages 5844-5866, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:19:p:5844-5866
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1791999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2020.1791999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2020.1791999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gu, Jing & Shi, Xinyu & Wang, Junyao & Xu, Xun, 2024. "Examining the impact of market power discrepancy between supply chain partners on firm financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:19:p:5844-5866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.