IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v59y2021i10p3062-3083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firms' preferences for retailing formats considering one manufacturer's emission reduction investment

Author

Listed:
  • Jinjin Liu
  • Hua Ke

Abstract

Nowadays, many countries and governments implement the cap-and-trade regulation to curb carbon emissions. This study aims to explore how the regulation affects an e-tailer's choice of retailing formats between marketplace and reseller as well as its partner's response by considering a supply chain composed of an e-tailer and a manufacturer. We also take the manufacturer's investment strategy into account and then develop four models to examine the two members' preferences for retailing formats. First, our results demonstrate that if a product's emissions in the retail process are medium (low) or the platform fee rate is relatively low (high), the e-tailer and the manufacturer both prefer marketplace (reseller) mode. Second, the e-tailer prefers to offer reseller mode for one manufacturer with a strong ability of emission reduction and offer marketplace mode otherwise; but the manufacturer's preference is opposed to the e-tailer's. Third, the manufacturer always benefits from her investment, regardless of in marketplace or reseller modes; the e-tailer's attitude towards the manufacturer's investment varies with retailing formats. Specifically, the e-tailer under reseller mode always prefers the manufacturer to invest; but under marketplace mode, he prefers the manufacturer to invest only when the latter's ability of emission reduction is weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinjin Liu & Hua Ke, 2021. "Firms' preferences for retailing formats considering one manufacturer's emission reduction investment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(10), pages 3062-3083, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:10:p:3062-3083
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1745314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2020.1745314
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2020.1745314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Xiaoping & Guo, Shunan & Cheng, T.C.E. & Du, Pengcheng, 2023. "The choice between the agency and reselling modes considering green technology with the cap-and-trade scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Xu, Xiaoping & Chen, Xinyang & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2024. "Platform financing versus bank financing: “When to choose which” for green production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 515-532.
    4. Xia, Liangjie & Li, Kang & Wang, Jun & Xia, Yi & Qin, Juanjuan, 2024. "Carbon emission reduction and precision marketing decisions of a platform supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Yanyan Zheng & Jin Zhang & Mengyuan Wang & Peng Liu & Tong Shu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Manufacturing or Not? Equilibrium Decisions for Capital-Constrained News Vendors with Subsidy and Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Zhang, Xuefeng & Li, Zhe & Li, Guo, 2024. "Grandfather-based or benchmark-based: Strategy choice for carbon quota allocation methods in the carbon neutrality era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:59:y:2021:i:10:p:3062-3083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.