IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v57y2019i7p2136-2159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processes and measurement of knowledge management in supply chains: an integrative systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • María del Rosario Pérez-Salazar
  • Alberto A. Aguilar-Lasserre
  • Miguel Gastón Cedillo-Campos
  • Ulises Juárez-Martínez
  • Rubén Posada-Gómez

Abstract

During the last 10 years, important contributions about knowledge management (KM) issues in supply chain management (SCM) have been published. The current paper aims to build upon previous literature reviews focused on KM in supply chains (SCs) from an integrative perspective, particularly recognising the studies conducted by Bhosale and Kant (2016. “Metadata Analysis of Knowledge Management in Supply Chain: Investigating the Past and Predicting the Future.” Business Process Management Journal 22 (1): 140–172) and Cerchione and Esposito (2016. “A Systematic Review of Supply Chain Knowledge Management Research: State of the Art and Research Opportunities.” International Journal of Production Economics 182: 276–292) as an effort to discuss the evolution of KM in the SC field. To this end, a systematic literature review including 210 papers is conducted over the period 2008–2017 from three positions previously not addressed jointly within the supply chain (SC) context: research methods employed by the authors; KM processes applied in the business processes across the SC; and intra and inter- organisational performance metrics linked with KM initiatives. Results exhibited that: (i) ‘Survey’ and ‘Case study’ are the two research methodologies mostly employed by authors (ii) the knowledge transfer is discussed in the majority of the studies reviewed, (iii) 114 intra and inter-organisational performance metrics are reported within the SC context from an empirical data approach. Findings concerning previous identified gap analysis and future lines of research are described.

Suggested Citation

  • María del Rosario Pérez-Salazar & Alberto A. Aguilar-Lasserre & Miguel Gastón Cedillo-Campos & Ulises Juárez-Martínez & Rubén Posada-Gómez, 2019. "Processes and measurement of knowledge management in supply chains: an integrative systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2136-2159, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:7:p:2136-2159
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1521530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2018.1521530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2018.1521530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Börühan, Gülmüş & Ersoy, Pervin & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Song, Malin, 2021. "Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-18.
    2. Atif Saleem Butt, 2021. "Determinants of top-down knowledge hiding in firms: an individual-level perspective," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 259-279, April.
    3. David Bamford & Iain Reid & Paul Forrester & Benjamin Dehe & Jim Bamford & Marina Papalexi, 2024. "An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1411-1443, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:7:p:2136-2159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.