IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v53y2015i15p4754-4768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability improvement and production decision under Cournot competition

Author

Listed:
  • He Huang
  • Ting Xie

Abstract

We consider two competing manufacturers who are unreliable and exert effort endogenously to improve their reliability within a dynamic decision framework. The manufacturers first decide the optimal level of effort and then input quantities after observing improvement outcomes. We explore the relationship between optimal input quantity and realised reliability, and find that the balance between two effects – price reduction effect and cost reduction effect – plays an important role. When market potential is low, the cost reduction effect dominates the price reduction effect, resulting in that the optimal input quantity increases in the realised reliability. The opposite situation is true when the market potential is high. By further examining the interaction between competition and reliability improvement, we find that the competition reduces the effort level of reliability improvement and this impact increases in the probability of the improvement success. In terms of expected input quantity, the reliability improvement intensifies competition with lower market potential but weakens competition with higher market potential. While in terms of expected output quantity to the market, the improvement behaviour of each competitor always intensifies competition by reducing the output inefficiency caused by random yield.

Suggested Citation

  • He Huang & Ting Xie, 2015. "Reliability improvement and production decision under Cournot competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(15), pages 4754-4768, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:15:p:4754-4768
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1043402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2015.1043402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2015.1043402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Junjian & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 658-671.
    2. Jianchang Fan & Debing Ni & Xiaowo Tang, 2017. "Product quality choice in two-echelon supply chains under post-sale liability: insights from wholesale price contracts," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 2556-2574, May.
    3. Milia Habib & Farouk Yalaoui & Hicham Chehade & Iman Jarkass & Nazir Chebbo, 2017. "Multi-objective design optimisation of repairable -out-of- subsystems in series with redundant dependency," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 7000-7021, December.
    4. Dong, Binwei & Tang, Wansheng & Zhou, Chi & Ren, Yufei, 2021. "Is dual sourcing a better choice? The impact of reliability improvement and contract manufacturer encroachment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Huang, Hongfu & Liu, Feng & Zhang, Peng, 2021. "To outsource or not to outsource? Warranty service provision strategies considering competition, costs and reliability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Mehmet Ali Soytaş & Damla Durak Uşar & Meltem Denizel, 2022. "Estimation of the static corporate sustainability interactions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 1245-1264, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:15:p:4754-4768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.