IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v8y2010i2p173-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge of the natural and the social: how are they different and what do they have in common?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhichang Zhu

Abstract

Knowledge of the natural and the social are irreducibly different yet have much in common. The differences lie at the levels of complexity they engage, modes of explanation they adopt, investigation aims they allow and whether they assert a ‘double hermeneutic’ effect to the behaviour of the studied objects. Knowledge are in common in that they are all construed out of available resources, justified based on the consequences of acting upon them, settled until better alternatives emerge, and serving as walking sticks for beating unknown paths in human life. Because of this, there can be no hierarchy of knowledge or unity of methodology, and dialogical encounters guided by situational ethics, not professional deafness driven by ontological/instrumental fallacies, are a viable strategy for morally and practically wise actions, including knowledge management projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhichang Zhu, 2010. "Knowledge of the natural and the social: how are they different and what do they have in common?," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 173-188, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:173-188
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2010.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2010.6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2010.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:173-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.