IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v3y2005i3p166-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using intellectual capital statements to determine value drivers and priorities for organizational change: a portfolio selection approach

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Andrikopoulos

Abstract

Ex post examination of a firm's performance in key intellectual capital indicators can demonstrate the value-creating potential and the organizational change aspect of intellectual capital reporting and management. These insights form the basis of an intellectual capital portfolio selection problem. Portfolio selection takes place in two stages. First, we calculate mean returns and variances for each market-valued portion of intellectual capital. Based on these estimations, we set up a portfolio selection problem. The solution to this portfolio selection problem provides priorities for organizational change. In this framework, the portfolio weights stand for organizational priorities, the weight constraints represent organizational barriers for change and the correlation of returns stands for the organizational interdependence of the intellectual capital components.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Andrikopoulos, 2005. "Using intellectual capital statements to determine value drivers and priorities for organizational change: a portfolio selection approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 166-172, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:3:y:2005:i:3:p:166-172
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:3:y:2005:i:3:p:166-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.