IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v2y2004i1p24-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee relationship and knowledge sharing: a case study of a Taiwanese finance and securities firm

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-hsien Liao
  • Juo-chiang Chang
  • Shih-chieh Cheng
  • Chia-mei Kuo

Abstract

Knowledge is a very important resource for preserving valuable heritage, learning new things, solving problems, creating core competences, and initiating new situations for both individual and organizations now and in the future. Knowledge sharing may be a power to encourage knowledge exchange and creation in the organizations in order to recognize their competitive advantages – the brainpower or intellectual capital. In this paper, we propose statistical hypotheses and implement statistical tests in a branch of a Taiwanese finance and securities firm in order to investigate the issue of employee relationship within the case firm, together with the attitudes and intentions toward knowledge sharing with their colleagues. By testing four hypotheses, we find that the relationship between some employees and the case firm is good, and those employees would like to share working knowledge and experience with colleagues voluntarily and unconditionally. On the other hand, the relationship between some employees and the case firm is not probably good, and those employees are reluctant to share working knowledge and experience with colleagues or under some conditional terms. Some research findings propose as managerial issue for discussion and future work. Finally, this paper concludes that the success of knowledge sharing in organizations, depend not only technological means, but is also related to behavioral factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-hsien Liao & Juo-chiang Chang & Shih-chieh Cheng & Chia-mei Kuo, 2004. "Employee relationship and knowledge sharing: a case study of a Taiwanese finance and securities firm," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 24-34, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:2:y:2004:i:1:p:24-34
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:2:y:2004:i:1:p:24-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.