IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v23y2025i1p77-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is stress always bad? The role of job stress in producing innovative ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Li
  • Yijing Liao
  • Wangshuai Wang
  • Xue Han
  • Zhiming Cheng
  • Gong Sun

Abstract

Drawing from activation theory and conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that there is a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship between job stress and creativity, and that this curvilinear effect will be moderated by thriving, which is a key to acquiring work or non-work knowledge to mitigate pressure. We conducted two studies: a lab experiment with 90 students from a university in eastern China and a questionnaire survey of 218 supervisor – subordinate dyads from a large state-owned enterprise in northern China. The results show that participants achieve higher performance on creative tasks when they have a moderate rather than low or high level of job stress. In addition, when thriving is high, employees can maintain a high level of creativity through knowledge acquisition and learning, regardless of how stressed they feel at work. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Li & Yijing Liao & Wangshuai Wang & Xue Han & Zhiming Cheng & Gong Sun, 2025. "Is stress always bad? The role of job stress in producing innovative ideas," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 77-88, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:77-88
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2023.2219402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:77-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.