IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v18y2020i4p439-449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Holistic knowledge management: adherence analysis of the Castillo and Cazarini model

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Corrêa
  • Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho

Abstract

The holistic paradigm has been identified as the preferred method for the development of KM frameworks. Under this premise, this research aims to analyse the adherence of the Castillo and Cazarini framework to holistic KM and to discern if its structure considers all the dimensions related to this form of management. Qualitative Content Analysis was employed to examine the framework and quantification was used to expose the percentage of this structure’s adherence to holistic KM. As a result, the Castillo and Cazarini framework partially adheres to holistic KM. This result allows inferring that there is an opportunity for the development of new frameworks that consider all the dimensions presented in this research. Additionally, the boundaries between KM and other forms of management require a greater and more in-depth theoretical analysis to discern what constitutes knowledge management more explicitly.

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Corrêa & Dárlinton Barbosa Feres Carvalho, 2020. "Holistic knowledge management: adherence analysis of the Castillo and Cazarini model," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 439-449, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:439-449
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1701963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701963
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2019.1701963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:439-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.