IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v15y2017i1p78-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of knowledge transfer on MNC subsidiary performance: does cultural distance matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Cindy Qin
  • Yue Wang
  • Prem Ramburuth

Abstract

Despite research on how multinational corporations (MNCs) manage knowledge transfer across national borders, little is known about the implications of such transfer on subsidiary performance and the intervening influence of cultural distance. This is an important topic because effective knowledge management in terms of performance outcome is crucial for MNCs to build competitive advantage. This paper tackles the topic by developing hypotheses to examine the interactive effects of cultural distance and knowledge transfer within MNCs on subsidiary performance. Our empirical study with China-based MNC subsidiaries in the IT industry shows that knowledge transfer is significantly and positively related to subsidiary performance, while cultural distance is significantly and negatively associated with subsidiary performance. In addition, we found that cultural distance moderates the knowledge transfer-subsidiary performance relationship. Specifically, cultural distance weakens the positive relationship in knowledge inflows, but enhances the positive relationship in knowledge outflows, and different directions of knowledge transfer, interacting with cultural distance, have varying effects on subsidiary performance. These findings have important implications for cross-culture knowledge management research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Cindy Qin & Yue Wang & Prem Ramburuth, 2017. "The impact of knowledge transfer on MNC subsidiary performance: does cultural distance matter?," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 78-89, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:78-89
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2015.24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2015.24
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2015.24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:78-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.