IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v15y2017i1p146-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of intra- and inter-team dynamics on organisational learning: role of knowledge-sharing capability

Author

Listed:
  • Alfred Presbitero
  • Banjo Roxas
  • Doren Chadee

Abstract

This research investigates the moderating role of knowledge-sharing capability on the effects of team dynamics on organisational learning by decomposing team dynamics into two types, namely, intra-team and inter-team dynamics. Using structural equation modelling techniques and data from a large-scale survey of employees in Australia, it is shown that inter-team dynamics has a larger direct effect on organisational learning compared with intra-team dynamics. However, when taking the moderating effects of knowledge-sharing capability into consideration, intra-team dynamics contribute more to organisational learning. The findings suggest that knowledge-sharing capability is more critical within teams rather than between teams in enhancing organisational learning. The implications of these findings for knowledge management research and practice are fully discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfred Presbitero & Banjo Roxas & Doren Chadee, 2017. "Effects of intra- and inter-team dynamics on organisational learning: role of knowledge-sharing capability," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 146-154, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:146-154
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2015.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2015.15
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2015.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:15:y:2017:i:1:p:146-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.