IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v14y2016i2p178-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge management in client–supplier relationship: emergent vs deliberate approach in small KIBS

Author

Listed:
  • Ettore Bolisani
  • Enrico Scarso
  • Luca Giuman

Abstract

It is often argued that small–medium enterprises (SMEs) do not manage knowledge the same way as large firms, but may need appropriate approaches to capture and exploit external knowledge effectively. This paper compares two opposite approaches to knowledge management (KM): one is called ‘deliberate’ or ‘planned’, and the other ‘emergent’. These approaches are analysed with reference to the management of knowledge pertaining to client–supplier relationships, which are particularly important in the case of small companies providing knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). A case study of a small KIBS company is illustrated, which has developed two different projects, based on different approaches to KM, for managing knowledge referring to clients. The case shows that, for a small company, an emergent approach to KM can be more suitable than a deliberate one for managing such knowledge. The implications of this result for KM research and practice are then examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Ettore Bolisani & Enrico Scarso & Luca Giuman, 2016. "Knowledge management in client–supplier relationship: emergent vs deliberate approach in small KIBS," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 178-185, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:14:y:2016:i:2:p:178-185
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2015.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2015.11
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2015.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:14:y:2016:i:2:p:178-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.