IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v13y2015i1p17-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unpacking ‘lessons learned’: investigating failures and considering alternative solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Wiewiora
  • Glen Murphy

Abstract

One of the most common ways to share project knowledge is to capture the positive and negative aspects of projects in the form of lessons learned (LL). If effectively used, this process can assist project managers in reusing project knowledge and preventing future projects from repeating mistakes. Nevertheless, the process of capturing, storing, reviewing and reusing LL often remains suboptimal. Despite the potential for rich knowledge capture, lessons are often documented as simple, line-item statements devoid of context. Findings from an empirical investigation across four cases revealed a range of reasons related to the perceived quality, process and visibility of LL that lead to their limited use and application. Drawn from the cross-case analysis, this paper investigates an integrated approach to LL involving the use of a collaborative Web-based tool, which is easily accessible, intelligible and user-friendly, allowing more effective sharing of project knowledge and overcoming existing problems with LL.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Wiewiora & Glen Murphy, 2015. "Unpacking ‘lessons learned’: investigating failures and considering alternative solutions," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 17-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:13:y:2015:i:1:p:17-30
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2013.26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2013.26
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2013.26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:13:y:2015:i:1:p:17-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.