IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v12y2014i1p86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competing Values Framework and its impact on the intellectual capital dimensions: evidence from different Portuguese organizational sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Aristides Isidoro Ferreira

Abstract

Organizational culture and intellectual capital (IC) have been important topics in the current organizational literature. However, few studies have analysed the correlations between these constructs. From this evidence, the main goal of the present study is to examine the correlation between the perceptions of organizational culture and the perception of IC measures. A sample consisting of 401 workers from the technological, health and services sector responded to the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument and the Intellectual Capital Scale. Results show that the Competing Values Framework dimensions (clan, adhocracy, hierarchy and market cultures) are correlated with the three IC dimensions studied (customer, structural and human capital). Our results also show that the culture explained variance varies across organizational sectors. The current study provides an initial contribution to the investigation of the correlation between perceived organizational culture and IC measures. The discussion and analysis ends with an integrated framework with practical implications for management, followed by suggestions and guidelines for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Aristides Isidoro Ferreira, 2014. "Competing Values Framework and its impact on the intellectual capital dimensions: evidence from different Portuguese organizational sectors," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 86-96, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2012.62
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2012.62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.