IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v11y2013i3p288-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploration of factors that impact voluntary contribution to electronic knowledge repositories in organizational settings

Author

Listed:
  • George Stewart
  • Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson

Abstract

The ascendance of knowledge to the rank of a key competitive resource has changed the way in which organizations attempt to manage what they know. To maintain their knowledge, organizations have implemented numerous strategies, one of which is the operation of knowledge repositories. Employees are expected to contribute their job-related knowledge to these repositories. Undoubtedly, this expectation creates dilemmas for both the employing organization and their employees. The organizations need the employees to contribute to the repositories in order to retain the knowledge within the organizations, but cannot force their employees to do so. The employees have to be convinced that it was worthwhile to contribute to these repositories. The study formulates and tests a theoretical model to explicate the Intention to Contribute and actual Knowledge Contribution of employees to organizational electronic knowledge repositories. Six previously uninvestigated relationships are proffered, and implications for practice are derived from the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • George Stewart & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson, 2013. "Exploration of factors that impact voluntary contribution to electronic knowledge repositories in organizational settings," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 288-312, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:11:y:2013:i:3:p:288-312
    DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2012.9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/kmrp.2012.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:11:y:2013:i:3:p:288-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.