IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v71y2020i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In defence of Soft OR: Reflections on teaching Soft OR

Author

Listed:
  • Fran Ackermann
  • James Alexander
  • Ashley Stephens
  • Brandon Pincombe

Abstract

Soft Operational Research (OR) methods, despite providing considerable benefit to organisations in tackling a range of problems, are not widely utilised by OR practitioners. Reasons include a lack of awareness of both methods and their benefits, perceptions that the methods lack the robustness of their “Hard” OR cousins and challenges in learning the methods. The research presented in this article seeks to better understand these issues and their implications for teaching Soft OR through (a) the development and delivery of a pedagogically informed bespoke training program in the Soft OR method Strategic Options Development and Analysis to analysts working in a Defence environment and (b) reflecting upon the training through analysis of learning diaries and trainee feedback. The findings contrast the challenges faced by post-experience and undergraduate students in learning Soft OR methods, and encompass (i) tailoring programs to match students’ experience, (ii) appreciating the significance of context in the adoption of Soft OR approaches, and (iii) identifying mechanisms for gaining competence and confidence in these approaches. The research aims to improve uptake of Soft OR methods, addresses a literature gap on the challenges of Soft OR from a learner perspective, and extends research in this area into the Defence domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Fran Ackermann & James Alexander & Ashley Stephens & Brandon Pincombe, 2020. "In defence of Soft OR: Reflections on teaching Soft OR," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1542960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2018.1542960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2018.1542960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck, 2021. "The emergence of problem structuring methods, 1950s–1989: An atlas of the journal literature," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 756-796, November.
    2. Stephen Harwood, 2023. "Complex Problems and Dealing with them on a Research Methods Course in a Business School," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 587-607, August.
    3. Ormerod, Richard & Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2023. "Understanding participant actions in OR interventions using practice theories: A research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 810-827.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:71:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.