IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v28y2019i1p21-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elaborating ADR while drifting away from its essence: A commentary on Mullarkey and Hevner

Author

Listed:
  • Maung K. Sein
  • Matti Rossi

Abstract

In their insightful critique of Action Design Research, Hevner and Mullarkey (this issue) proposed an enhancement of ADR by juxtaposing concepts from a well cited framework of Design Science Research (DSR) developed by Peffers et al. (2007). In this commentary, we argue that while we agree with some of their elaborations, such as unpacking the specific stages of ADR to make them more transparent and accessible and incorporating formalization of learning in every stage, we also disagree with Hevner and Mullarkey on two key areas. The first is depicting multiple different entry points to an ADR project, which goes against the essential spirit of ADR’s single entry point, problem formulation. More importantly, in juxtaposing the Peffers et al. framework of DSR on to ADR, they are combining two approaches that are epistemologically incommensurate. Peffers et al. take a deductive design approach while ADR employs principally an inductive epistemology by giving primacy to the guided emergence of the artifact. In spite of our disagreements, we conclude that both approaches are premised upon pragmatism where researchers are guided more by utility and usefulness rather than an abstract notion of truth. Our disagreements are essential characteristics of a healthy academic discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Maung K. Sein & Matti Rossi, 2019. "Elaborating ADR while drifting away from its essence: A commentary on Mullarkey and Hevner," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 21-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:21-25
    DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1527189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1527189
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1527189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthea Venter & Marne Vries, 2023. "Demonstrating the Elaborated Action Design Research (eADR) Model to Address Communication Challenges During Software Development," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 407-425, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:21-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.