IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/teepxx/v6y2017i2p153-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bivariate probit analysis of factors affecting partial, complete and continued adoption of soil carbon sequestration technology in rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoyao Ji
  • Ram Ranjan
  • Michael Burton

Abstract

There remain significant technological as well as socio-economic and behavioural challenges to conservation tillage adoption despite its acknowledged carbon mitigation potential. In this paper, we distinguish between the factors that influence partial, complete and continued adoption of conservation tillage in a rural region of north western China. As complete benefits of conservation tillage to the private farmers as well as society are realised only through continued adoption, it is important to identify and distinguish the factors that promote long-term adoption of conservation tillage from the ones that lead only to short-term adoption. Using a bivariate probit analysis, we find that government subsidy programmes and households’ wealth play a key role in the continued adoption of conservation tillage practices. Poorer farmers and those whose neighbours have abandoned conservation tillage are more likely to give up on conservation tillage, after having adopted initially. Geographical factors and fragmented land holdings encourage only partial adoption, even under government subsidies. We recommend the introduction of smaller and portable farming machines combined with long-term subsidy schemes. When faced with government budget constraints that make prolonged subsidy for all difficult, targeting the farmer groups according to their socio-economic traits is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoyao Ji & Ram Ranjan & Michael Burton, 2017. "A bivariate probit analysis of factors affecting partial, complete and continued adoption of soil carbon sequestration technology in rural China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 153-167, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:153-167
    DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2016.1234418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21606544.2016.1234418
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21606544.2016.1234418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asenso-Okyere, Kwadwo & Chiang, Catherine & Thangata, Paul & Andam, Kwaw S., 2011. "Interactions between health and farm-labor productivity:," Food policy reports 23, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Wade, Tara & Kurkalova, Lyubov A. & Secchi, Silvia, 2012. "Using the logit model with aggregated choice data in estimation of Iowa corn farmers’ conservation tillage subsidies," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124974, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Kai & He, Chuantian & Ma, Chunbo & Wang, Dong, 2019. "Does carbon farming provide a cost-effective option to mitigate GHG emissions? Evidence from China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen, Summer L. & Badiane, Ousmane & Ulimwengu, John M., 2012. "Government expenditures, social outcomes, and marginal productivity of agricultural inputs: a case study for Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 1172, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Ibrahim, S. B & Srinivasan, C. S. & Georgantzis, N. & Arowolo, A. O., 2020. "Effects of Ill-Health and Disability on Wage Employment Participation Decision by Smallholder Agricultural Households In Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 10(1), October.
    3. Ligane Massamba Séne & Ousmane Badiane, 2016. "Out-of-pocket health payments: a catalyst for agriculturalproductivity growth, but with potentially impoverishingeffects in Senegal," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(1), pages 29-49.
    4. Toyin Samuel Olowogbon & Raphael Olanrewaju Babatunde & Edward Asiedu, 2019. "How Can Inclusive Agricultural Health Policy Intervention Promote Shared Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria? Evidence from Randomized Control Trial," NBER Working Papers 26043, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Jean-Marc Montaud & Mahamadou Roufahi Tankari, 2013. "When social goals meet economic goals: the double dividend of extending free access to healthcare in Uganda," Working Papers hal-01880339, HAL.
    6. Jean-Marc Montaud & Mahamadou Roufahi Tankari, 2013. "When social goals meet economic goals: the double dividend of extending free access to healthcare in Uganda," Working Papers hal-01880339, HAL.
    7. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Dennis Asante & Jesse Nuamah Brako & Zhao Ding & Yuansheng Jiang, 2023. "The Relationship between Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases of Fish Farm Household Members and Production Efficiency: The Case of Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Sene, Ligane Massamba & Badiane, Ousmane, 2015. "Out-of-pocket health payments: a catalyst for agricultural productivity growth, but with potentially impoverishing effects," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212261, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:6:y:2017:i:2:p:153-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/teep20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.