IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i7p868-883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global adaptation governance: how intergovernmental organizations mainstream climate change adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Maria Dellmuth
  • Maria-Therese Gustafsson

Abstract

Climate change adaptation is increasingly being mainstreamed into all types of organizations across the world. A large number of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), such as the European Union, the World Bank, or Food and Agriculture Organization, have already started to mainstream adaptation. Yet, despite a surge in scholarly interest in climate policy integration over the past decade, adaptation is still predominantly studied as a local issue and mainstreaming in IGOs remains poorly understood. In this article, we develop and test an innovative framework for examining adaptation mainstreaming practices in IGOs. Using quantitative and qualitative data derived from extensive fieldwork conducted between 2017 and 2020, we examine mainstreaming practices in a large number of IGOs and arrive at two key findings. First, adaptation has been mainstreamed within the procedures and outputs of IGOs across ten (nonclimate) issue areas, while there is also evidence of important issue-specific variation. Second, there is variation across mainstreaming practices in the sense that discursive mainstreaming is most common, whereas more concrete collaboration, policy change affecting projects and programs, and budget allocations are less common. We conclude with a discussion of how our framework can inform the theory and practice of global adaptation governance.KEY POLICY INSIGHTS IGOs have mainstreamed adaptation into a large array of issue areas, yet scholarly and practical debates remain siloed.Mainstreaming adaptation has advanced most in IGOs in the areas of food and development and least in the domain of migration and security.Discursive mainstreaming is more common than other types of adaptation mainstreaming in IGOs, regardless of the issue area.Global governance is a distinct setting in which powerful states, institutional complexity, and funding constraints strongly affect IGO practices to successfully mainstream adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Maria Dellmuth & Maria-Therese Gustafsson, 2021. "Global adaptation governance: how intergovernmental organizations mainstream climate change adaptation," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 868-883, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:7:p:868-883
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1927661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2021.1927661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2021.1927661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Rhinard & Claudia Morsut & Elisabeth Angell & Simon Neby & Mathilda Englund & Karina Barquet & Heleen Mees & Jana Surian & Swapnil Vashishtha & Lisa Segnestam & Ole Andreas Hegland Engen, 2024. "Understanding variation in national climate change adaptation: Securitization in focus," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(4), pages 676-696, June.
    2. Nicole J. Wilson & Maria G. Lira & Grace O’Hanlon, 2022. "A systematic scoping review of Indigenous governance concepts in the climate governance literature," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Bartnicki, Grzegorz & Klimczak, Marcin & Ziembicki, Piotr, 2023. "Evaluation of the effects of optimization of gas boiler burner control by means of an innovative method of Fuel Input Factor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:7:p:868-883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.