IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v13y2013i6p698-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil society lobbying and countries' climate change policies: a matching approach

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias B�hmelt

Abstract

Does civil society lobbying affect states' policies on climate change? Does it facilitate or hamper cooperation towards 'greener' policies? Environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) and business lobbying groups alike are increasingly seeking to access states' negotiation delegations at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in order to affect or even change official delegates' policies. Previous studies have failed to control for the fact that the set of states that have granted civil society access to their delegations is unlikely to be a random sample. Moreover, the fact that a delegation's policy outputs may converge with the preferences of a civil society group cannot be taken as evidence that it was caused by civil society lobbying. A matching approach that addresses both problems is proposed, which corrects for the non-random assignment of civil society organizations to state delegations and forms quasi-experimental contrasts by sampling a set of 'most similar' cases that only differ in their treatment; i.e. civil society lobbying. This approach facilitates a causal interpretation of lobbying efforts. The results indicate that only business groups are likely to exert a causal influence on states' climate delegations. However, contrary to expectations, these groups appear to have enhanced states' efforts towards environmentally friendly policies. Policy relevance What impact can non-governmental actors have in influencing states' policies at the climate change negotiations? This question is addressed empirically using a matching approach, which corrects potential challenges in the research on interest group influence. It is shown that business groups are likely to influence states' policies at the UNFCCC - unlike green interest groups or civil society in general. In light of these findings, three policy implications are derived that might be of importance for states and non-governmental decision makers alike. Most importantly, ENGOs should refocus their efforts for exerting their influence. ENGOs could make their lobbying more effective by first identifying the states that may be more receptive to their preferences and positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias B�hmelt, 2013. "Civil society lobbying and countries' climate change policies: a matching approach," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 698-717, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:13:y:2013:i:6:p:698-717
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2013.788870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2013.788870
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2013.788870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Jonathan A & Brown, L. David, 1998. ""Introduction", in The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt2gn108dn, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sierra, Jazmin & Hochstetler, Kathryn, 2017. "Transnational activist networks and rising powers: transparency and environmental concerns in the Brazilian National Development Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 79089, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Dorado, Silvia & Ventresca, Marc J., 2013. "Crescive entrepreneurship in complex social problems: Institutional conditions for entrepreneurial engagement," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 69-82.
    4. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, 2011. "Global Governance," Chapters, in: Jonathan Michie (ed.), The Handbook of Globalisation, Second Edition, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Manologlou, E. & Tsartas, P. & Markou, A., 2004. "Geothermal energy sources for water production--socio-economic effects and people's wishes on Milos island: a case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 623-633, March.
    6. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2020. "Transnational cooperation in times of rapid global changes: The Arctic Council as a success case?," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Paul Nelson, 2006. "The varied and conditional integration of NGOs in the aid system: NGOs and the World Bank," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(5), pages 701-713.
    8. Webber, Michael & McDonald, Brooke, 2004. "Involuntary Resettlement, Production and Income: Evidence from Xiaolangdi, PRC," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 673-690, April.
    9. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Nuruzzaman Mohammed, 2009. "Globalization and Resistance Movements in the Periphery: An Alternative Theoretical Approach," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-31, November.
    11. Mina Ličen & Sergeja Slapničar, 2022. "Can process accountability mitigate myopic biases? An experimental analysis," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Fox, Jonathan A, 2010. "Coalitions and networks," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt1x05031j, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    13. Koslinski, Mariane Campelo & Reis, Elisa P., 2009. "Transnational and Domestic Relations of NGOs in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 714-725, March.
    14. Farkas, Ferenc & Molnár, Mónika, 2005. "Szimultán elszámoltathatóság és kapcsolatrendszerek a nonprofit szervezetek működésében [Simultaneous accountability and connection systems in the operation of non-profit organizations]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 763-770.
    15. Fox, Jonathan A., 2015. "Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 346-361.
    16. Emma Mawdsley & Jonathan Rigg, 2002. "A survey of the World Development Reports I: discursive strategies," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 2(2), pages 93-111, April.
    17. James Caporaso & Sidney Tarrow, 2008. "Polanyi in Brussels: European institutions and the embedding of markets in society," RECON Online Working Papers Series 1, RECON.
    18. Fox, Jonathan A, 2000. "The World Bank and social capital: Lessons from ten rural development projects in the Philippines and Mexico," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt1vj8v86j, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    19. Deborah J. Yashar, 2007. "Resistance and Identity Politics in an Age of Globalization," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 610(1), pages 160-181, March.
    20. Serra, Teresa & Poli, Elena, 2015. "Shadow prices of social capital in rural India, a nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 892-903.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:13:y:2013:i:6:p:698-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.