IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v13y2013i5p608-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rising powers: the evolving role of BASIC countries

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Hallding
  • Marie J�risoo
  • Marcus Carson
  • Aaron Atteridge

Abstract

The exponential growth in global populations, economic activity and resource utilization means it is becoming increasingly difficult to satisfy global demand for a number of fundamental resources, while some key ecosystems services are under stress. The likelihood of future resource scarcities have begun to influence the positions taken within international climate change negotiations by fast-growing developing countries. When Brazil, South Africa, India, and China formed the BASIC group it took many by surprise. The coordination needed to align this heterogeneous group of countries cannot simply be understood in terms of a set of shared interests around climate policy. How the BASIC group emerged and the nature of its cooperation on climate change are examined within the broader context in which these increasingly powerful countries came to join forces. Although traditionally aligned with the G77 group of developing countries, recent strategising as a group of emerging economies reflects their realization that there are insufficient global resources available to follow the same development pathway as industrialized countries. Hence, they must seek alternative growth pathways, which requires establishing common ground while also keeping track of each others' positions on important global issues like climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Hallding & Marie J�risoo & Marcus Carson & Aaron Atteridge, 2013. "Rising powers: the evolving role of BASIC countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 608-631, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:13:y:2013:i:5:p:608-631
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2013.822654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2013.822654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2013.822654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trevor Houser, 2010. "Copenhagen, the Accord, and the Way Forward," Policy Briefs PB10-5, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ranjini Murali & Aishwarya Kuwar & Harini Nagendra, 2021. "Who’s responsible for climate change? Untangling threads of media discussions in India, Nigeria, Australia, and the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Alexander Thompson, 2020. "Emerging Powers and Differentiation in Global Climate Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 61-72, October.
    3. Liyuan Liu & Jing Zhu & Yibin Zhang & Xiding Chen, 2020. "An Optimal Pollution Control Model for Environmental Protection Cooperation between Developing and Developed Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Nick Nash & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Stuart Capstick & Valdiney Gouveia & Rafaella Carvalho Rodrigues Araújo & Monika Santos & Romeo Palakatsela & Yuebai Liu & Marie K. Harder & Xiao Wang, 2020. "Local climate change cultures: climate-relevant discursive practices in three emerging economies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 63-82, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph E. Aldy & William A. Pizer & Keigo Akimoto, 2017. "Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 501-515, May.
    2. Carlo Carraro & Emanuele Massetti, 2012. "Beyond Copenhagen: a realistic climate policy in a fragmented world," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 523-542, February.
    3. Robert Falkner, 2015. "A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits and international legitimacy," GRI Working Papers 197, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    4. Robert Falkner & Hannes Stephan & John Vogler, 2010. "International climate policy after Copenhagen: towards a �building blocks� approach," GRI Working Papers 21, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    5. Rob Dellink & Gregory Briner & Christa Clapp, 2011. "The Copenhagen Accord/Cancún Agreements Emission Pledges For 2020: Exploring Economic And Environmental Impacts," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 53-78.
    6. Fouré, Jean & Guimbard, Houssein & Monjon, Stéphanie, 2012. "Border carbon adjustment and potential trade retaliation: an evaluation with MIRAGE-e," Conference papers 332266, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Jotzo, Frank, 2010. "Comparing the Copenhagen emissions targets," Working Papers 249378, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    8. Yongsheng Zhang, 2015. "Reformulating the low-carbon green growth strategy in China," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(sup1), pages 40-59, December.
    9. Mattoo, Aaditya & Subramanian, Arvind, 2013. "A"greenprint"for international cooperation on climate change," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6440, The World Bank.
    10. Trevor Houser & Jason Selfe, 2011. "Delivering on US Climate Finance Commitments," Working Paper Series WP11-19, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    11. Aldy, Joseph E. & Pizer, William A. & Akimoto, Keigo, 2015. "A natural outcome of the emerging pledge and review approach to international climate change policy is the interest in comparing mitigation efforts among countries. Domestic publics and stakeholders w," RFF Working Paper Series dp-15-32, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:13:y:2013:i:5:p:608-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.