IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v27y2024i1p111-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The psychological contract of women athletes in semi-professional team sports

Author

Listed:
  • Tracy Taylor
  • Wendy O’Brien
  • Kristine Toohey
  • Clare Hanlon

Abstract

Within the dynamic landscape of women’s semi-professional and professional leagues, athletes and their employers are negotiating their employment relationship parameters. Positioning our research in a postfeminist sensibility, we explore both parties’ expectations and obligations through psychological contract (PC) theory. We conducted interviews across two semi-professional sports leagues, with 30 athletes, 20 coaches and managers and two league-level representatives. The data analysis identified three themes: 1. Obligations, commitment, and choice; 2. Expectations of conformity and power relations; 3. Fulfilling organisational goals. Many athletes spoke about power imbalances in the PC with employers “exploiting” athletes’ desire to be play in the league at almost any cost. Athletes felt they had little choice but to accept the current state of employment, endure sacrifices and hope for a better future where they could reach their potential through viable career pathways and a living wage. Our research provides a better understanding of the PC employment relationship and associated implications. Greater knowledge about PCs could be used to develop work practices and relations that enhance and benefit athletes and employers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracy Taylor & Wendy O’Brien & Kristine Toohey & Clare Hanlon, 2024. "The psychological contract of women athletes in semi-professional team sports," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 111-129, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:111-129
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2023.2243110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2023.2243110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2023.2243110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:111-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.