IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v8y2004i2p33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Nuclear Risk Perception: With Focus on Developing Effective Policy Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Yong-Jin Cha

Abstract

This study examines the nature of risk perceptions associated with nuclear power. The purpose is to explore the relative importance of variables in predicting individual differences in the risk perceptions of nuclear power, and to examine the potential implications for policy. This study proposes to develop a more comprehensive understanding of variables that predict the risk perceptions associated with nuclear power. In this study, multivariate analyses are conducted. Dependent variable is the risk perceptions of nuclear power. Independent variables include perceived risk characteristics, perceptions of need for nuclear power, knowledge levels of nuclear power, trust in information sources and management, experiences (familiarity) with nuclear power, participation, perceptions of costs (disadvantage) and benefits (advantages), and demographics. The method used for data collection is a survey (structured interview) with 500 randomly selected individuals from the Youngkwang (YK) nuclear power plant in Korea. The results indicate several variables are significant. The potential policy implications of the findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong-Jin Cha, 2004. "An Analysis of Nuclear Risk Perception: With Focus on Developing Effective Policy Alternatives," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 33-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:8:y:2004:i:2:p:33-47
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2004.10805027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2004.10805027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2004.10805027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:8:y:2004:i:2:p:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.