IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v6y2001i2p61-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Network Management for Governmental Projects in the U.S.: The Case of the Smart Road Location and Design

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Won Kim

Abstract

This case study examines how and why the policy network of a state agency in the U.S. formed and changed over time in the context of local opposition to the location and design of a road. It also explores how state-level administrators in that state dealt with these network dynamics to overcome local opposition. In setting up and carrying out the “Smart Road” project, the Salem District Office under the Virginia Department of Transportation had vertical and horizontal ties with numerous actors with stakes in the project. These linkages varied in the degrees of cooperativeness and interdependence between those actors and the agency. Network stability was mostly developed and sustained by actors with whom the agency had both cooperative and interdependent relationships, but unequal relationships in interdependence easily reduced the degrees of cooperativeness and finally undermined network stability. The role of administrators who were charged with external relations was to scrutinize network changes and to maintain network stability by promoting the trust and cooperation of other actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Won Kim, 2001. "Policy Network Management for Governmental Projects in the U.S.: The Case of the Smart Road Location and Design," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 61-70, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:6:y:2001:i:2:p:61-70
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2001.10804980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2001.10804980
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2001.10804980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:6:y:2001:i:2:p:61-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.