IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v29y2024i3p251-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When helping hurts: the impact of social belonging interventions on public employees’ happiness at work

Author

Listed:
  • Pananda Chansukree

Abstract

This study deployed an advice-giving survey experiment among public employees in order to test the impact of social belonging interventions on happiness at work. Participants (N = 1,250) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the treatment group gave advice and then reported happiness at work, while the control group flipped this sequence, reporting their happiness at work and then giving advice. Contrasting previous studies, our findings show that social belonging interventions in the form of advice-giving negatively affect happiness at work. The treatment group reported lower happiness scores across all survey items compared to the control group. Various phenomena may explain this finding: the advice-giving task may 1) threaten public employees’ professional identity, especially if they feel unqualified to advise on workplace well-being, 2) require emotional labor and compassion fatigue, or 3) lead public employees to focus more on existing problems and challenges, lowering their self-reported happiness at work. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms behind these findings and their implications for enhancing well-being in the public sector workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Pananda Chansukree, 2024. "When helping hurts: the impact of social belonging interventions on public employees’ happiness at work," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 251-265, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:251-265
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2024.2393508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2024.2393508
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2024.2393508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:29:y:2024:i:3:p:251-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.