IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v22y2017i2p93-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How is public health service performance related to institutional arrangements in OECD countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Heungsuk Choi
  • Seungjoo Han
  • Hyosook Yim

Abstract

This study compares the institutional arrangements and performance of the public health services in 30 OECD countries using a fuzzy-set ideal-type analysis and Fs/QCA. Three dimensions of the institutional arrangements have been selected to empirically classify the public health service systems: (1) the ways in which financial resources are created, (2) the extent to which consumers can choose service providers, and (3) the extent to which the government regulates public health service providers in terms of service price, operational procedures, and facilities. The fuzzy-set ideal-type analysis results in eight categories of public health service systems on the basis of their institutional arrangements. This fuzzy-set ideal typology is richer in detail to characterize institutional arrangements for public health services, while at the same time largely embracing the existing theoretical categorizations of the public health service systems of the OECD countries. The Fs/QCA has identified conjunctural sufficient conditions to explain the performance of the public health service systems. Hence, the results of the analysis provide several policy implications. For example, there can be multiple paths to longer life expectancy in higher income countries. One such path is to have national health insurance while allowing more choices for health service providers. Another path is to effectively regulate the prices of medicine and medical services, while not intervening in health insurance and service provider issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Heungsuk Choi & Seungjoo Han & Hyosook Yim, 2017. "How is public health service performance related to institutional arrangements in OECD countries?," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 93-106, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:22:y:2017:i:2:p:93-106
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2017.1341743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2017.1341743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2017.1341743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. António Afonso & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2006. "Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: a DEA Approach with Non-discretionary Inputs," Working Papers Department of Economics 2006/33, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Poças & Elias Soukiazis, 2010. "Health Status Determinants in the OECD Countries. A Panel Data Approach with Endogenous Regressors," GEMF Working Papers 2010-04, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    2. Asem Alshami, 2016. "Theoretical Evidences Regarding Methodologies Of Calculating Efficiency Of Public Sector," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 34(4), pages 88-94.
    3. Livio Di Matteo & Thomas Barbiero, 2020. "Spend Less, Get More? Explaining Health Spending and Outcome Differences Between Canada and Italy," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 12(4), pages 403-438, December.
    4. Francesco Porcelli, 2014. "Electoral accountability and local government efficiency: quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian health care sector reforms," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 221-251, August.
    5. Aristovnik, Aleksander & Obadić, Alka, 2014. "Measuring relative efficiency of secondary education in selected EU and OECD countries: the case of Slovenia and Croatia," MPRA Paper 63936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Aristovnik, Aleksander, 2012. "The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis," MPRA Paper 39805, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Thöne, Michael & Dobroschke, Stephan, 2010. "Qualität der öffentlichen Finanzen – Anwendung des Ansatzes der EU-Kommission auf Deutschland [The Quality of Public Finances – Assessment and exemplary application of the proposed approach by the ," FiFo Reports - FiFo-Berichte 12, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    8. Mihai MutaÅŸcu & Marius MiloÅŸ, 2009. "Optimal Size Of Government Spending. The Case Of European Union Member States," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-45.
    9. Yasar A. Ozcan & Jaya Khushalani, 2017. "Assessing efficiency of public health and medical care provision in OECD countries after a decade of reform," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(2), pages 325-343, June.
    10. António Afonso & Ludger Schuknecht & Vito Tanzi, 2010. "Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(3), pages 367-389, September.
    11. Gunther Tichy, 2017. "Mangelnde Effizienz als Erfolgsbremse," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 90(9), pages 677-699, September.
    12. Puertas, Rosa & Marti, Luisa & Guaita-Martinez, José M., 2020. "Innovation, lifestyle, policy and socioeconomic factors: An analysis of European quality of life," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Rouven Edgar Haschka & Katharina Schley & Helmut Herwartz, 2020. "Provision of health care services and regional diversity in Germany: insights from a Bayesian health frontier analysis with spatial dependencies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(1), pages 55-71, February.
    14. Francesco Porcelli, 2009. "Effects of fiscal decentralisation and electoral accountability efficiency evidence from the Italian health care sector," Working Papers 2009/29, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    15. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "The role of external factors versus managerial ability in determining seaports’ relative efficiency: An input-by-input analysis through a multi-step approach on a panel of Southern European ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(2), pages 121-141, June.
    16. Dar, Khursheed Hussain & Raina, Shahid Hamid, 2024. "Public healthcare efficiency in India: Estimates and determinants using two stage DEA approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Saba Madaeen & Mohammad Adeinat, 2018. "The Health Sector in Jordan: Effectiveness and Efficiency," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 234-234, December.
    18. Maria Cristina Gramani, 2014. "Inter-Regional Performance of the Public Health System in a High-Inequality Country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, January.
    19. Núria Bosch & Marta Espasa & Toni Mora, 2012. "Citizen Control and the Efficiency of Local Public Services," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(2), pages 248-266, April.
    20. Breitenbach, Marthinus C & Ngobeni, Victor & Ayte, Goodness, 2020. "The first 100 days of COVID-19 coronavirus – How efficient did country health systems perform to flatten the curve in the first wave?," MPRA Paper 8872, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:22:y:2017:i:2:p:93-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.