IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v14y2010i3p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Tool to Measure Ethical Sensitivity in Public Administration and its Application

Author

Listed:
  • Do Lim Choi
  • James L. Perry

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a measurement tool to test perception of ethical sensitivity (ES) in the area of public administration and to apply this measurement. The primary hypothesis is “Ethical sensitivity will be low.” Main results are as follows. First, the low ethical sensitivity of respondents was identified. Second, the free ticket case showed a different pattern from the other two cases, fund raising and mangled data. In the open-ended situation, respondents picked up more ethical dimensions. Third, public administrators are ethically less sensitive in situations related to organizational hierarchy. Fourth, the ethical sensitivity level of people may differ in terms of situational, organizational, or individual characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Do Lim Choi & James L. Perry, 2010. "Developing a Tool to Measure Ethical Sensitivity in Public Administration and its Application," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2010.10805157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805157
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2010.10805157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:14:y:2010:i:3:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.