IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v13y2008i2p49-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four Perspectives for Understanding Land Use Regulation in America

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar E. Ramírez De La Cruz
  • Hyung Jun Park

Abstract

As an issue concerning the government, the different approaches to understanding the regulation of land use can be better understood through the light of major trends in the literature on public administration in America. Fundamental questions related to land use regulation have received different answers through the years. These questions are the counterpart of broader questions with philosophical and practical implications for a society. We discuss the basic dilemma that public administration faces regarding the regulation of land use. We examine how four perspectives – the liberal-judicial view, expert definition of public interest view, economic view, and social values as public interest – help scholars understand land use regulation in America. One theoretical model that could integrate the main ideas of these normative perspectives is the idea of urban field, which deals with the complexity of forces that are related to the idea of urban field.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar E. Ramírez De La Cruz & Hyung Jun Park, 2008. "Four Perspectives for Understanding Land Use Regulation in America," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 49-62, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:13:y:2008:i:2:p:49-62
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2008.10805121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2008.10805121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2008.10805121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:13:y:2008:i:2:p:49-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.