IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v23y2016i3p379-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Postigo

Abstract

East Asian countries have implemented around 60 free trade agreements (FTAs), mostly bilateral, to become one of the most active sites of regionalism. The dominant analyses portray these FTAs as driven primarily by foreign policy motivations and promoted by political leaders with businesses marginally involved or interested. It is contended here that, compared to other forms of liberalization, bilateral FTA negotiations promote new institutional arrangements within government agencies and business associations and unique configurations of government–business relations. Formulation of FTAs imposes greater information demands on government officials, which should compel them to consult business associations. In turn, clearer identification of FTAs' impacts and greater chances to affect their formulation should increase business incentives to lobby for or against FTA liberalization domestically and across borders. Demands on officials and business associations upon successive FTAs should foster institutional change/creation to reduce information and coordination costs. These hypotheses were tested on the bilateral FTAs of Thailand and Malaysia. FTAs in these countries stimulated government–business consultations and lobbying by businesses that, for some key FTAs, took the initiative. Successive negotiations strengthened the technical capacities of officials and business associations and stimulated the emergence of new institutions, which may endure to provide similar functions for multilateral rounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Postigo, 2016. "Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 379-417, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:379-417
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1135178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2015.1135178
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2015.1135178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher M. Dent, 2006. "New Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-62791-8, March.
    2. Cornelia Woll, 2008. "Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade," Post-Print hal-02183956, HAL.
    3. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2008. "The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Asia," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-58419-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Postigo, 2022. "Utilization of GSP schemes as a political and economic determinant of the utilization of North-South FTAs," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 1420-1447, September.
    2. Russel Kingshott & Piyush Sharma & Peter Hosie & Nebojsa Davcik, 2019. "Interactive impact of ethnic distance and cultural familiarity on the perceived effects of free trade agreements," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 135-160, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Postigo, Antonio, 2016. "Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements: government-business relations in the policymaking of bilateral free trade agreements," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Solís Mireya, 2013. "Business advocacy in Asian PTAs: a model of selective corporate lobbying with evidence from Japan," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 87-116, March.
    3. Postigo, Antonio, 2016. "Institutional spillovers from the negotiation and formulation of East Asian free trade agreements: Government-business relations in the policymaking of bilateral free trade agreements," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 379-417.
    4. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2012. "Identity, policy ideas, and Asian diplomacy: Japan’s response to the rise of China," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 15(4), pages 359-376, December.
    5. Ben Clift, 2012. "Comparative Capitalisms, Ideational Political Economy and French Post- Dirigiste Responses to the Global Financial Crisis," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 565-590, November.
    6. Caroline Dufy, 2015. "Redefining Business Values in Russia: The Boundaries of Globalisation and Patriotism in Contemporary Russian Industry," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(1), pages 84-101, January.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m3igpqi is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Regina M. Abrami & Yu Zheng, 2010. "The New Face of Chinese Industrial Policy: Making Sense of Anti-Dumping Cases in the Petrochemical and Steel Industries," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-042, Harvard Business School.
    9. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2014. "The determinants of FTA use in Southeast Asia: A firm-level analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 32-45.
    10. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/f5vtl5h9a73d5ls976m1ga289 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Cornelia Woll, 2011. "Beyond Ideological Battles: A Strategic Analysis of Hedge Fund Regulation in Europe," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 2, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    12. Richard Higgott, 2012. "The Utility and Limits of the ‘European Model’ for the Regional Institutionalization of East Asia," Chapters, in: Jehoon Park & T. J. Pempel & Geng Xiao (ed.), Asian Responses to the Global Financial Crisis, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Lake, James & Nken, Moïse & Yildiz, Halis Murat, 2020. "Tariff bindings and the dynamic formation of Preferential Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2013. "Regional Trade Agreements and Enterprises in Southeast Asia," ADBI Working Papers 442, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    15. Jeffrey M. Chwieroth & Timothy J. Sinclair, 2013. "How you stand depends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 457-485, June.
    16. Agnes Orban, 2016. "Mobilizing moral boundaries: the politics of derivatives reform in the US," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 555-573, November.
    17. Christopher Dent, 2009. "Japan, China and East Asian regionalism: implications for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 161-178, February.
    18. Hervé Dumez & Sandra Renou, 2019. "Do renewable sources of energy exist? Can the energy transition be steered?," Post-Print hal-03089097, HAL.
    19. Abdelal Rawi, 2015. "The multinational firm and geopolitics: Europe, Russian energy, and power," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 553-576, October.
    20. Peter J. Katzenstein & Stephen C. Nelson, 2013. "Reading the right signals and reading the signals right: IPE and the financial crisis of 2008," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 1101-1131, October.
    21. Judith Cherry, 2018. "The Hydra revisited: expectations and perceptions of the impact of the EU-Korea free trade agreement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 19-35, March.
    22. Downie, Christian, 2017. "Business actors, political resistance, and strategies for policymakers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 583-592.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:3:p:379-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.