IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v26y2024i8p2355-2379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Hohensinn
  • Jurgen Willems
  • Meikel Soliman
  • Dieter Vanderelst
  • Jonathan Stoll

Abstract

We investigate whether the perceived ethicalness of police actions changes when police follow an AI-robot’s advice. We assess whether perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when police follow robot advice to arrest a passer-by, compared to no robot advice to arrest the passer-by. Using neutralization theory, we test how blame-shifting occurs. When police violently arrest an innocent passer-by, the violence is neutralized when the decision was made following the AI-robot. Perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when the passer-by is a terrorist, and police violence against a passer-by is neutralized through ‘denial of victim’ and ‘denial of injury’.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Hohensinn & Jurgen Willems & Meikel Soliman & Dieter Vanderelst & Jonathan Stoll, 2024. "Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 2355-2379, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:8:p:2355-2379
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2269203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2023.2269203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2023.2269203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:8:p:2355-2379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.