IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v26y2024i6p1498-1525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucrat or artificial intelligence: people’s preferences and perceptions of government service

Author

Listed:
  • Dongfang Gaozhao
  • James E. Wright
  • Mylah K. Gainey

Abstract

The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in public service delivery presents important yet unanswered questions about citizens’ views of AI. Are citizens’ perceptions of decisions made by AI different from those made by bureaucrats? We answer this question by conducting a conjoint experiment. Our results show that individuals prefer minority bureaucrats over AI to make decisions. This is particularly true for racially minoritized citizens. However, when passive representation within the bureaucracy is unavailable, racially minoritized individuals do not have a clear-cut preference between AI and out-group bureaucrats. Our findings provide insight into the interaction between automation, representation, and equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongfang Gaozhao & James E. Wright & Mylah K. Gainey, 2024. "Bureaucrat or artificial intelligence: people’s preferences and perceptions of government service," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1498-1525, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:6:p:1498-1525
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2160488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2022.2160488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2022.2160488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:6:p:1498-1525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.