IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v26y2024i1p89-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

Author

Listed:
  • Minwoo Ahn
  • Elizabeth Baldwin

Abstract

Collaborative governance can positively affect desired policy outcomes, but questions remain about who benefits. This article asks how and to what extent collaborative governance of utility conservation programmes in the U.S. states affects industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers’ programme benefits. Panel data analysis shows that collaborative processes improve the equitable distribution of energy savings, but inequities persist, particularly for residential ratepayers. Additional qualitative analysis suggests representation in the collaborative process is not a major driver of equitable distribution of benefits, but that over time, collaboration can help participants to look beyond their individual interests and advocate for other stakeholders’ interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Minwoo Ahn & Elizabeth Baldwin, 2024. "Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 89-113, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:89-113
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:26:y:2024:i:1:p:89-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.