IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v21y2019i11p1646-1664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coproduction and trust in government: evidence from survey experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Sinah Kang
  • Gregg G. Van Ryzin

Abstract

While previous research has investigated how coproduction can improve the quality and efficiency of public services, less is known about its effects on how citizens view government. Thus, we investigate how coproduction may influence trust in government using a series of survey experiments. Although our main results are generally in the expected direction, they are not significant statistically and thus suggest little or no causal effect of coproduction on trust. Limitations of our approach, as well as directions for future experimental research along these lines, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinah Kang & Gregg G. Van Ryzin, 2019. "Coproduction and trust in government: evidence from survey experiments," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1646-1664, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:21:y:2019:i:11:p:1646-1664
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1619812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Talia Goren & Dana R. Vashdi & Itai Beeri, 2022. "Count on trust: the indirect effect of trust in government on policy compliance with health behavior instructions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 593-630, December.
    2. Amoozadeh Mahdiraji, Hanif, 2024. "Culture of Cynicism and Cooperation: Extracting Ways Out of Non-Cooperation with Government Trap by the Usage of Gaming," SocArXiv jx4h9, Center for Open Science.
    3. Talia Goren & Itai Beeri & Dana R. Vashdi, 2023. "Framing policies to mobilize citizens' behavior during a crisis: Examining the effects of positive and negative vaccination incentivizing policies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 570-591, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:21:y:2019:i:11:p:1646-1664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.