IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v20y2018i7p997-1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘What insights do fitness landscape models provide for theory and practice in public administration?’

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Lee Rhodes
  • Conor Dowling

Abstract

This paper assesses the extent to which a fitness landscape (FL) perspective on complex social systems offers useful insights for both theory and practice in public administration. It has been claimed that FL models have strong potential for integrating existing theory and facilitating the development of models for theory development and testing as well as offering the prospect of a better understanding of the adaptive moves of agents in search of a better ‘fit’ with their environment. In this paper, we examine these claims through a thematic synthesis of recent literature purporting to adopt this perspective in public management. Through a systematic review of the literature, we identify the key themes in the application of FLs to theory and practice and the extent to which authors are reaching any conclusions on the precise use of each of the elements of FL models in public management contexts. We conclude that the use of FL models is underdeveloped and that further development would be particularly useful in the context of governance network theory. We close with four specific recommendations for further research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Lee Rhodes & Conor Dowling, 2018. "‘What insights do fitness landscape models provide for theory and practice in public administration?’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 997-1012, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:7:p:997-1012
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1364412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364412
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2017.1364412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:7:p:997-1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.