IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v19y2017i9p1221-1234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Walker
  • Oliver James
  • Gene A. Brewer

Abstract

Replication is increasingly recognized as an important part of knowledge production in the social sciences, especially for experimental research. However, despite growing use of experiments, replication is little discussed or practiced in public management. We review the approach to replication taken by research in leading public management journals and note its scarcity. We then use a typology developed by Tsang and Kwan to classify the experimental replications undertaken by the articles in this special issue, which reveals a substantial variety of approach. We conclude by suggesting that replication is undertaken for different purposes and present a protocol about replication for experimental public management research.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Walker & Oliver James & Gene A. Brewer, 2017. "Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1221-1234, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:9:p:1221-1234
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1282003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donald Moynihan, 2018. "A great schism approaching? Towards a micro and macro public administration," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 1(1).
    2. Paula M. G. Veen-Dirks & Marijke C. Leliveld & Wesley Kaufmann, 2021. "The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 269-294, June.
    3. Seungkook Roh & Hae-Gyung Geong, 2021. "Extending the Coverage of the Trust–Acceptability Model: The Negative Effect of Trust in Government on Nuclear Power Acceptance in South Korea under a Nuclear Phase-Out Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Schoofs, Lieze & Claeys, An-Sofie, 2021. "Communicating sadness: The impact of emotional crisis communication on the organizational post-crisis reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 271-282.
    5. repec:bpd:articl:v:1:y:2018:i:2:jbpa.12.34 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Abhishek Bhati & Ruth K. Hansen, 2020. "A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    7. Zhao, Yang, 2021. "Manuscript1," OSF Preprints 79k4e, Center for Open Science.
    8. Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen & Peter John & Albert Meijer & Ben Worthy, 2019. "Do Freedom of Information Laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
    9. Saulitis, Andris & Chapkovski, Philipp, 2023. "Investigating Tax Compliance with Mixed-Methods Approach: The Effect of Normative Appeals Among the Firms in Latvia," MPRA Paper 116560, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:9:p:1221-1234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.