IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v19y2017i1p20-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political innovation as ideal and strategy: the case of aleatoric democracy in the City of Utrecht

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Meijer
  • Reinout van der Veer
  • Albert Faber
  • Julia Penning de Vries

Abstract

Political innovations aim to strengthen democracy but few connect well to the institutionalized democratic context. This paper explores how political innovations can be successfully embedded in existing democratic systems. It builds upon both the literature on political innovation and on new democratic arrangements and studies a practice of aleatoric democracy – using the lottery instead of elections to select representatives – in the Dutch City of Utrecht. The case study shows how the idealist logic of improving democracy and the realist logic of realizing specific political goals intertwine to get the political innovation accepted by the institutionalized democratic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Meijer & Reinout van der Veer & Albert Faber & Julia Penning de Vries, 2017. "Political innovation as ideal and strategy: the case of aleatoric democracy in the City of Utrecht," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 20-36, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:1:p:20-36
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200666
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Georges L. Romme & Christopher Ansell & John Buck & Younghoon Choi & Rob van der Eyden & Ver?nica Figueroa Huencho & Edwin John & Tracy Kunkler & Johanna Mair & Albert Meijer & Renate Meyer & Karen, 2018. "United People: Designing A New Model of Global Governance," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(4), pages 152-170, April.
    2. Wang, Yanyu & You, Qinghua & Qiao, Yuanbo, 2022. "Political genes drive innovation: Political endorsements and low-quality innovation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 407-417.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:19:y:2017:i:1:p:20-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.