IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v15y2014i3p389-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What constitutes a "successful" mega transport project?/Leadership, risk and storylines: The case of the Sydney Cross City Tunnel/The case of the LGV Méditerranée high speed railway line/Dealing with context and uncertainty in the development of the Athens Metro Base Project/What constitutes a "successful" mega transport project? Lessons from the Metropolitan Expressway in Tokyo/The RandstadRail project: A case study in decision-making strategies under uncertainty/Constructive conflicts in the case of the Öresund Link/Perspectives on "success" from the UK Channel Tunnel Rail Link Project/Some concluding remarks

Author

Listed:
  • Harry T. Dimitriou
  • Nicholas Low
  • Sophie Sturup
  • Genevieve Zembri
  • Elisabeth Campagnac
  • George Kaparos
  • Pantoleon Skayannis
  • Yasunori Muromachi
  • Seiji Iwakura
  • Kazuya Itaya
  • Mendel Giezen
  • Luca Bertolini
  • Willem Salet
  • Jamil Khan
  • Fredrik Petterson
  • Bengt Holmberg
  • E. John Ward
  • Phil G. Wright
  • Harry T. Dimitriou
  • Harry T. Dimitriou

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Harry T. Dimitriou & Nicholas Low & Sophie Sturup & Genevieve Zembri & Elisabeth Campagnac & George Kaparos & Pantoleon Skayannis & Yasunori Muromachi & Seiji Iwakura & Kazuya Itaya & Mendel Giezen & , 2014. "What constitutes a "successful" mega transport project?/Leadership, risk and storylines: The case of the Sydney Cross City Tunnel/The case of the LGV Méditerranée high speed railway line/Dea," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 389-430, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:15:y:2014:i:3:p:389-430
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2014.935084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2014.935084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2014.935084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bent Flyvbjerg (ed.), 2014. "Megaproject Planning and Management: Essential Readings," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, volume 0, number 14769.
    2. Frick, Karen Trapenberg, 2008. "The Cost of the Technological Sublime: Daring Ingenuity and the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2d00f48t, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dotti, Nicola Francesco, 2018. "Knowledge that matters for the ‘survival of unfittest’: The case of the new Brussels' rail junction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 131-140.
    2. David Eggleton, 2020. "Tailoring Leadership to the Phase-Specific Needs of Large Scale Research Infrastructures," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-15, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuno Oliveira & Fabrice Lumineau, 2017. "How Coordination Trajectories Influence the Performance of Interorganizational Project Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1029-1060, December.
    2. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2013. "Why Mass Media Matter to Planning Research: The Case of Megaprojects," Papers 1304.1665, arXiv.org.
    3. Natalya Sergeeva & Johan Ninan, 2023. "Comparisons as a discursive tool: shaping megaproject narratives in the United Kingdom," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(2), pages 197-211.
    4. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    5. Kronvall, Anna, 2023. "Large-scale projects and the green transition: Key concepts and outlook," IRS Dialog 1/2023, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    6. Flyvbjerg, Bent & Bester, Dirk W., 2021. "The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 395-419, October.
    7. Joachim Thiel & Gernot Grabher, 2015. "Crossing Boundaries: Exploring the London Olympics 2012 as a Field-Configuring Event," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 229-249, April.
    8. Graeme Hodge & Carsten Greve, 2013. "Public–private partnership in developing and governing mega-projects," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 9, pages 182-208, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Pansera, Mario & Lloveras, Javier & Durrant, Daniel, 2024. "The infrastructural conditions of (de-)growth: The case of the internet," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Tom Ogwang & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Resource-Financed Infrastructure: Thoughts on Four Chinese-Financed Projects in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Bent Flyvbjerg & Cass R. Sunstein, 2015. "The Principle of the Malevolent Hiding Hand; or, the Planning Fallacy Writ Large," Papers 1509.01526, arXiv.org.
    12. Kai-Kristina Lattrich & Marion Büttgen, 2020. "Project leaders’ control resources and role overload as predictors of project success: developing the job demands–resources model," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 767-788, July.
    13. Shankar Sankaran & Ralf Müller & Nathalie Drouin, 2020. "Creating a ‘sustainability sublime’ to enable megaprojects to meet the United Nations sustainable development goals," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 813-826, September.
    14. Salvador Bertomeu & Antonio Estache, 2016. "Unbundling Political and Economic Rationality: a Non-Parametric Approach Tested on Spain," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2016-17, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Schwanitz, Valeria Jana & Wierling, August, 2016. "Offshore wind investments – Realism about cost developments is necessary," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 170-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:15:y:2014:i:3:p:389-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.