IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v39y2023i1-2p60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility revolution and the future of Russian studies

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Libman

Abstract

The credibility revolution transformed quantitative social sciences and was both a curse and a blessing for Russian studies. On the one hand, Russia turned out to be an attractive field for experimentalist research, which allowed Russian studies to gain unprecedented recognition in the broader disciplines. On the other hand, a focus on causal identification could have contributed to insufficient attention to potentially important topics relevant for understanding Russia and to some aspects of the Russian setting able to augment the general social science discourse. The war in Ukraine makes many causal identification designs used for studying Russia (with the exception of natural experiments) difficult or impossible to implement. It may make the return to other approaches and de-emphasizing causal identification necessary, at least to some extent. At the same time, the question remains of how the general social science disciplines will perceive such shift in focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Libman, 2023. "Credibility revolution and the future of Russian studies," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1-2), pages 60-69, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:39:y:2023:i:1-2:p:60-69
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2148446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2148446
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2148446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:39:y:2023:i:1-2:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.