IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v40y2025i2p223-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint City: cross-border planning diffusion, local elites, and planning practices – case studies of Kouang-Tchéou-Wan and Swatow, 1898–1945

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Liu
  • Baihao Li
  • Congcong Yao

Abstract

This comparative study on urban planning in Kouang-Tchéou-Wan (Guangzhou Wan) and Swatow (Shantou) in the first half of the twentieth century can offer insights into the dialogue between colonial and historic cities. Kouang-Tchéou-Wan and Swatow are cities that features ‘collaboration’ – between the government and local elites in urban modernization. This collaboration significantly impacted the adaptation and expression of urban planning in new temporal and spatial environments. The collaboration occurred in ‘underdeveloped public domains’, including public institutions and spaces. This study confidently offers the following conclusions. First, negotiation plays an essential role in ‘collaboration’: the Municipal Council is identified as the primary organization responsible for negotiations; realism, project feasibility, and mutual interests are the main themes of these negotiations. Second, ‘collaboration’ can create irreconcilable contradictions in the landscape, which can be seen as the result of specific historical contexts: the struggle for discourse in public spaces and the transition from spatial zoning to new class categorizations. This study further discusses necessary conditions for a dialogue between colonial and historical cities: being at a similar ‘nation-locality’ transformation stage, such as decentralization from the state to the localities; close communication within regional societies; similar local social environments and urban development foundations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Liu & Baihao Li & Congcong Yao, 2025. "Joint City: cross-border planning diffusion, local elites, and planning practices – case studies of Kouang-Tchéou-Wan and Swatow, 1898–1945," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 223-263, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:223-263
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2024.2369885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2024.2369885
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2024.2369885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:223-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.