IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rppexx/v35y2020i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The preparation of town planning schemes in the Metropolitan Police District, excluding the county of London, 1909–1934

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P. Collins

Abstract

This article examines the key issues and operational problems which arose when the district councils in the Metropolitan Police District prepared town planning schemes between 1909 and 1934. Their positive response was perhaps surprising bearing in mind that the planning system introduced in 1909 was cumbersome, tightly constrained and time consuming, that no provision was made for exercising control over built up areas, that town and regional planning were in their infancy both as a professional activity and fields of academic study, and that it was not until the 1920s that the Ministry of Health issued detailed guidance on the preparation, form and content of town planning schemes. Despite these problems, 73% of the Metropolitan Police District was subject to interim planning control by 1933. This provided a planning framework which was apparently accepted by most landowners judging from the small number of planning appeals that were lodged and the even smaller number that were upheld. They were, however, unable to overcome the problems presented by the statutory provisions for compensation, and thus prevent the wave of residential development which took place in the Metropolis and surrounding Home Counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P. Collins, 2020. "The preparation of town planning schemes in the Metropolitan Police District, excluding the county of London, 1909–1934," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:35:y:2020:i:1:p:1-26
    DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2018.1501729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02665433.2018.1501729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02665433.2018.1501729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rppexx:v:35:y:2020:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rppe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.