IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v17y2017i1-2p136-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of the physical and physiological load of a boxing-specific simulation protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Thomson
  • Kevin Lamb

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the physical and physiological responses to simulated amateur boxing of 3 × 3-min rounds. Using an externally valid technical and ambulatory demand, 28 amateur boxers (mean ± SD; age 22.4 ± 3.5 years, body mass 67.7 ± 10.1 kg, stature 171 ± 9 cm) completed the protocol following familiarisation. The physiological load was determined continuously via collection of mean (HRmean) and peak (HRpeak) heart rate, breath-by-breath oxygen uptake (V˙$ \dot{V} $O2), aerobic energy expenditure (EEaer), excess carbon dioxide production (CO2excess), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and post-performance blood lactate. Physical performance was quantified as the acceleration delivered to the target by punches. HRmean and HRpeak were found to exceed 165 and 178 b min−1, absolute V˙$ \dot{V} $O2 > 124.6 ml kg−1, EEaer > 30.7 kcal min−1 and acceleration via 78 punches >2697 g during each round. Mean blood lactate (4.6 mmol l−1) and CO2excess (438.7 ml min−1) were higher than typical resting values reflecting a notable anaerobic contribution. RPEs reinforced the intensity of exercise was strenuous (>6–8). For all measures, there were typical increases (p < 0.05; moderate ES) across rounds. Accordingly, boxers might consider high-intensity (>90% V˙$ \dot{V} $O2max) interval training in anticipation such exercise yields improvements in aerobic conditioning. Moreover, the current simulation protocol – the boxing conditioning and fitness test – could be used as a form of training per se and as a means to monitor intervention-based changes in aspects of boxing-related physiology and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Thomson & Kevin Lamb, 2017. "Quantification of the physical and physiological load of a boxing-specific simulation protocol," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1-2), pages 136-148, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:1-2:p:136-148
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1304048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2017.1304048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew P Bacon & Rickey E Carter & Eric A Ogle & Michael J Joyner, 2013. "VO2max Trainability and High Intensity Interval Training in Humans: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Wei & Ju-Yang Chi & Jane C.-J. Chao & Yen-Nung Lin, 2022. "An Intelligent Cardiopulmonary Training System and Adherence to Training Intensity: A Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Henryk Duda & Łukasz Rydzik & Wojciech Czarny & Wiesław Błach & Karol Görner & Tadeusz Ambroży, 2020. "Reaction of the Organisms of Young Football Players to City Smog in the Sports Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Manuel Chavarrias & Santos Villafaina & Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez & Jorge Carlos-Vivas & Eugenio Merellano-Navarro & Jorge Pérez-Gómez, 2020. "Zumba ® , Fat Mass and Maximum Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Tianhao Chen & Jingxia Lin & Yuzhe Lin & Lin Xu & Dian Lu & Fangping Li & Lihao Hou & Clare Chung Wah Yu, 2021. "Effects of aerobic exercise and resistance exercise on physical indexes and cardiovascular risk factors in obese and overweight school-age children: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Shih-Chieh Chang & Alessandra Adami & Hsin-Chin Lin & Yin-Chou Lin & Carl P C Chen & Tieh-Cheng Fu & Chih-Chin Hsu & Shu-Chun Huang, 2020. "Relationship between maximal incremental and high-intensity interval exercise performance in elite athletes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:1-2:p:136-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.