IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v14y2014i1p42-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Abián
  • Adrian Castanedo
  • Xing Qiao Feng
  • Javier Sampedro
  • Javier Abian-Vicen

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the notational structure in men’s singles games between the Olympic Games in Beijing and London to observe how badminton evolved from 2008 to 2012. Twenty games of each event (n=40), were analyzed using the official videos of the Beijing 2008 and London 2012 Olympic Games. Game duration (Beijing:1124.6±229.9 s vs. London:1260.3±267.1 s; P<0.05), real time played (Beijing:306.9±45.7 s vs. London:354.7±86.5 s; P<0.05), rally time, shots per rally, rest time at point 11, rest time between games and shots per rally were significantly higher in London than in Beijing. Rally time intervals between 0-2.9 s were more frequent in Beijing (P<0.05) than in London and rest time between rallies of 27-29.9 s were more frequent in London (P<0.05); this distribution of time intervals suggests that badminton is evolving towards longer rallies with greater rest intervals pushing the limits of the badminton regulations. No differences were found between Beijing and London in the distribution of the last shot in each rally. In conclusion the timing factors of the badminton game was different in London 2012 from Beijing 2008, badminton is evolving towards longer rallies with greater rest intervals resulting in longer matches.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Abián & Adrian Castanedo & Xing Qiao Feng & Javier Sampedro & Javier Abian-Vicen, 2014. "Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 42-53, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:42-53
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Sánchez-Pay & David Sanz-Rivas, 2021. "Competitive Evolution of Professional Wheelchair Tennis from the Paralympic Games in Athens 2004 to Rio 2016: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Miguel-Ángel Gomez & Fernando Rivas & Jonathan D. Connor & Anthony S. Leicht, 2019. "Performance Differences of Temporal Parameters and Point Outcome Between Elite Men’s and Women’s Badminton Players According to Match-Related Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Galeano, Javier & Gómez, Miguel-Ángel & Rivas, Fernando & Buldú, Javier M., 2022. "Using Markov chains to identify player’s performance in badminton," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    4. Gómez, Miguel–Ángel & Rivas, Fernando & Leicht, Anthony S. & Buldú, Javier M., 2020. "Using network science to unveil badminton performance patterns," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:42-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.