IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v11y2016i1p83-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobility Infrastructures: Modern Visions, Affective Environments and the Problem of Car Parking

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Merriman

Abstract

This paper builds upon recent research on mobility infrastructures to question the usefulness of the mobility/moorings binary and suggest that scholars should examine the practices of infrastructuring by which mobile subjects, affects and environments emerge. The paper outlines recent work on the affective qualities of mobility infrastructures before examining some of the diverse discourses, feelings and atmospheres which have gathered around the humble British car park over the past 50 years. It examines how the affective and experiential qualities of car parks and parking became commodified by car park designers, urban redevelopers and landscape architects, as new techniques and technologies were adopted to prevent wasteful ‘space-searching’ and design secure, safe, pleasant and aesthetically pleasing spaces. Finally, the paper examines some of the discourses and regulative practices which have gathered around the direct and indirect environmental impacts of parking provision and parking policies, from their influence on local ecology and hydrology, to the use of parking regulations and charges to try and reshape people’s mobility habits and reduce their environmental footprints.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Merriman, 2016. "Mobility Infrastructures: Modern Visions, Affective Environments and the Problem of Car Parking," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 83-98, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:83-98
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2015.1097036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2015.1097036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2015.1097036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoup, Donald, 2011. "Yes, Parking Reform Is Possible: A progress report from the author of 'The High Cost of Free Parking'," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4p60t8ck, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soto, Jose J. & Márquez, Luis & Macea, Luis F., 2018. "Accounting for attitudes on parking choice: An integrated choice and latent variable approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 65-77.
    2. Ragnhild Dahl Wikstrøm & Lars Böcker, 2020. "Changing Suburban Daily Mobilities in Response to a Mobility Intervention: A Qualitative Investigation of an E-bike Trial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Peter Merriman, 2019. "Relational governance, distributed agency and the unfolding of movements, habits and environments: Parking practices and regulations in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1400-1417, December.
    4. Paul Simpson, 2017. "A sense of the cycling environment: Felt experiences of infrastructure and atmospheres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 426-447, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Baldwin Hess, 2017. "Repealing minimum parking requirements in Buffalo: new directions for land use and development," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 442-467, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:83-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.