IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v40y2025i1p159-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fencing, Biosecurity and Wild Boar Politics in the Danish-German Borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Eilenberg
  • Annika Pohl Harrisson

Abstract

This paper investigates the spatial strategies of fencing and the politics of biosecurity in a European borderland setting. It considers the way in which national spaces and borders are co-produced through spatial strategies of fencing, discourses of biosecurity, and notions of the intrusive other. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the Danish-German borderlands, the paper examines the physical and discursive creation of a (bio)security fence stretching the entire length of the border – constructed to prevent the migration of Eurasian wild boars and the spread of the highly contagious viral disease African Swine Fever. A disease that could potentially contaminate domestic farmed pigs and severely affect pork exports. Although government narratives justifying the border fence focus on external factors like African Swine Fever, the paper argues that this physical security barrier is not only a biosecurity defense against external threats, but to some also a reflection of symbolism, political imaginaries and ideas of belonging (for both humans and non-humans).

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Eilenberg & Annika Pohl Harrisson, 2025. "Fencing, Biosecurity and Wild Boar Politics in the Danish-German Borderland," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 159-177, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:159-177
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2023.2289122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2023.2289122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2023.2289122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:40:y:2025:i:1:p:159-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.