IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v39y2024i4p623-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fencing the Desert: Contexts and Politics of the Gulf Border Walls

Author

Listed:
  • Said Saddiki

Abstract

The borders of the Gulf states reflect neither historical development nor equitable demographic and geographic distribution. Rather, they were mainly generated by colonial powers for political and economic purposes. This artificial delimitation created new national identities and left many territorial disputes between the Gulf states and their neighbors, which still affect their bilateral relations and the regional subsystem. Security threats and suspicious relations between the Gulf countries have prompted them to unilaterally secure their borders with physical and virtual walls. The first border wall in the Gulf was erected by Kuwait after its liberation from the Iraqi invasion in 1991. After that, the number of border walls in the region has doubled. Today, the Gulf is the most walled region in the world. It is, in fact, a complex border fencing that applies to both external and internal regional borders. In addition to security and political reasons, these walls reflect how these borders were created and how the gulf states themselves were established. Despite the large expenditures on these border fortifications, their effectiveness in achieving security remains controversial.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Saddiki, 2024. "Fencing the Desert: Contexts and Politics of the Gulf Border Walls," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 623-636, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:623-636
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2023.2168293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2023.2168293
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2023.2168293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:39:y:2024:i:4:p:623-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.